The Life and Afterlife of the Paris Commune. 

We generally don’t see Paris as a city scarred by war. It is not like London and Berlin, where the drab modern architecture of the urban centers offers silent reminders of past aerial bombardment. It is not like Warsaw and Frankfurt, where the “old towns” are modern re-creations, erected over cleared fields of corpse-filled rubble. Despite revolutions, sieges, World War I shelling, and World War II bombings, Paris still possesses a remarkable architectural unity. The city’s center looks much as it did in the late 19th century.

Source: The Life and Afterlife of the Paris Commune. | Portside

Sanders, meet the competition

The initiatives of Bernie Sanders have a paradoxical aspect. At this point, I would say here we go again. As usual, we are left to wonder, is this a left activist gesture or a book launch in motion?

Sanders gets a break here: we need all the help we can get. The realm of publicity has bypassed the range of the left, but a Senator of the US, and a socialist is an opportunity that deserves its hearing. But, of course, Sanders is no socialist, but, apparently a social democrat, or else simply an FDR-New Dealist.

But the overall context here is disappointing, and this is the third time starting over, perhaps another presidential run, doomed to fail, and otherwise even if elected, crippled day one.

Whatever, consider the book aspect: it is hard to overcome suspicions here. Compare this projected new book with my The Last Revolution. Sanders has all the book biz hoopla behind him. By December the book will be published (a long delay as climate accelerates, the book should be free pdf available today), it will cost $28, and will not do much more that blow hot air on the left. To be fair, it can help to mediate ideological hypnosis over capitalism, etc…Not to kick a gift horse in the mouth. We can be sure it won’t get specific about anything. It will envision a new future but take no steps to realize them, with no movement, no reference to revolution as an issue, and nothing that would destabilize the comfy situation of a senator.

The Last Revolution by contrast is ready to go even at the level of readable drafts, has a complete blueprint to create a form of neo-communism, dozens of related aspects, a new perspective on history and evolution, a model of modernity and revolution/reform, a self-published status outside the book market that makes all its authors suspiciously coopted, and free of charge if you care to download a copy. It is light years ahead of Bernie’s pastiche but unfortunately, it will suffer a series of problems:.  complete social cancellation, even on the left, which can’t tolerate outsiders or self-published authors they can’t control, or critics of Marxism and its cult followers, etc…. Public ignorance of the book’s existence, given a zero advertising budget, is of course the sad reality. Further, the book tries to tell the truth on the 9/11 false flag operation, the JFK assassination, and their cover-ups. Ssanders wouldn’t dare discuss, say, 9/ll and the way the US and the Zionist mafia murdered thousands of American citizens and got away with it. Finally, the most unforgivable sin, an expose of Darwinism and its theory of natural selection as a social Darwinist ideology that amazingly the entire cadre of biologists, plus the left, can dare to expose.

However, the Internet has changed this situation, to the consternation of many establishments. A book offered free can get tens of thousands of readers, which is something. The Last Revolution picks up a steady set of readers, slowly but surely eating away at the foundations of several ideologies.

In any case, Sanders is in the midst of a strange lost opportunity, a real movement outside the mainstream. But he will again pull his punches and end up in neutral gear. Perhaps it is simple fear of the consequences that self-censors the slant references using punch-pulled rhetoric to social changes that in fact imply revolutionary action.

Anyway, save you $28 dollars: consider the full debriefing of The Last Revolution and the explicit challenge to the capitalist order

The_Last_Revolution_Postcapitalist_Futures_ED3_version_11_17_22

One of the reasons I wrote The Last Revolution is to counter the constant talk of social change implying revolution without any serious intent to carry out any such measures.
Sanders will make a lot of money from this book but absolutely nothing will change beyond more radical sounding rhetoric.
The left can’t even stage a protest march with permit on Washington…

“Humane, clear-eyed, and—yes—angry, this is a vital book for our times and for our future,” said publishing director Thomas Penn.

Source: New Bernie Sanders Book to Declare: “It’s OK to Be Angry About Capitalism”

Sanders is all talk and no, gasp…revolution…//New Bernie Sanders Book to Declare: “It’s OK to Be Angry About Capitalism”

One of the reasons I wrote The Last Revolution is to counter the constant talk of social change implying revolution without any serious intent to carry out any such measures.
Sanders will make a lot of money from this book but absolutely nothing will change beyond more radical sounding rhetoric.
The left can’t even stage a protest march with permit on Washington…

“Humane, clear-eyed, and—yes—angry, this is a vital book for our times and for our future,” said publishing director Thomas Penn.

Source: New Bernie Sanders Book to Declare: “It’s OK to Be Angry About Capitalism”

British poets and the French Revolution  

Revolution in general acts as the locomotive of history. This profound observation of Leon Trotsky applies not just to the development of the productive forces but equally to that of culture in its most general sense. The French Revolution was a fundamental turning point in world history. Like a heavy stone dropped into a silent lake, it caused waves that disturbed the most distant shores.

Source: British poets and the French Revolution | Art | History & Theory

Jacobin: Britain’s Third King Charles Should Be Its Last – 1848+: The End(s) of History

The historical background of the English Civil War is apt here and to be a third Charles in the wake of that history might leave a royalist queasy, fearful for the head that bears the crown. The English Civil War was one of the greatest gestation moments of modern democracy and all sorts of gremlins appeared out of the woodwork, viz. the Diggers, etc…
And yet that revolution passed into chaotifications, and in the end the sad tale ends in the Restoration which is counterrevolution triumphant, given only the ambiguous emergence of Parliament as a sort of queer monstrosity.
I was watching the movie version of Tale of Two Cities, not exactly Dickens’ finest but it gives an unwitting portrait of the outcome of the Restoration period: the contrast of the conservative English and the fiery French revolutionaries. A fairly exact account of the ghosts that haunt the Brit kings, and now poor Charles the Third, keelhauled between a Charles the First and the Second…Egad…
The British monarchy is haunted by such images and suffers the curse of revolutionary reaction and failure in the endphase of the great Civil War.

The latest British monarch will be the first King Charles since the Stuart dynasty of the 17th century. The revolutionary struggle against the Stuarts gave birth to a radical democratic tradition —…

Source: Britain’s Third King Charles Should Be Its Last – 1848+: The End(s) of History