Marx the upper class snob puts Weitling in his place…

There is something oddly revealing about Marx and Weitling. We get a snapshot of what Marx really thought about working-class types. He was a plain bourgeois snob. The debate over theory is complex, but in a way Weitling was right. Marx’s theories are a mysterious form of ‘I am smart you are stupid’ so I am the bourgeois classes who gets to snub workers like Weitling. Marx’s theories all backfired. Weitlint is actually right here. Marx’s theories have crippled the left.
Marx’s treatment of Weitling is outrageous. The working class is an abstraction for him, and his theories were off the mark.

In 1846 Weitling complained that the “intellectuals” Marx and Engels wrote only about obscure matters of no interest to the workers. Marx angrily responded with the following words, “Ignorance never yet helped anybody.” Marx’s response is as valid today as it was then.

Source: In Defence of Marxism

Strategic idiocy

We tried to explain our critical marxism in a previous post. Here, whatever the case over Biden, I am often surprised by the stance of the Marxist type left. The DSA wants to take fifty years to build up working class support in a revolutionary workers party. They had one in the early twentieth century. But now they have nothing. Given the climate change calamity, we don’t have fifty years. We have maybe five. The left has confused itself: it can’t do anything without the working class, and they once attracted the working class but now they can’t. They can’t even trust unions anymore: they are run by fat cats as crypto establishment. This is the failed strategy par excellence.

The left needs a new formulation. A focus on the working class is great, but the left must deal with any and all from any class who will join in the effort to create socialism. The idea you have to wait for the working class to do that is almost ridiculous. It won’t happen, and if it did the result would probably fail anyway. The Russian situation came close, but the working class were swiftly left out of the Bolshevik result.
The left is mostly working class itself, and middle class. The left is using nineteenth century jargon in a situation that has changed. The issue of the working class refers to early proletarian revolution: to be working class you either worked in the factory system or you starved. That’s not true anymore. The working class is a middle class variant, and sure enough not revolutionary. In my own case, I am working class: I have worked in the American industrial system for a long time: picking apples in Washington, weeding spinach on Arizona truck farms with a short handle hoe. Roustabout in oil fields, dozen of jobs all a flash in pan ending on freight trains to find still another job. I am middle class, upper class, working class, lumpen, I also went to a prep school and college and could have been upper class at will, had I wished. As a classic scholar noone would hire me so I was de facto either working class, or panhandler, hitchhiker or, well, I never stooped to petty crime. I own a book business name, so I am even a capitalist, I guess. Some think me a shady character, so I am a lumpenprole to boot. After all that I will court the wrath of idiot leftists who want to work only with factory assembly line working class cliches. I have worked assembly in a score of factories as temp labor, scorned by the working class types who had the good jobs there. You guess it, working classes have classes, and the upper working class looks down on the their inferiors. So are working class temps human trash, as the steady working class thinks? I am working class, I guess, so form a party around me. Not much chance of that. In almost any revolution done by marxist idiots I would be dead day one. The point is that the class analysis doesn’t work any more. And the left forgets that anyone who works at wage labor is working, which means almost everyone. So create a party of any and all and that’s a working class party. The left completely misunderstands their own jargon and are using the fiction of a working class to do nothing.

As the pressure to support the lesser evil grows, socialists should be proud that their largest organization is charting a path of independence.

Source: It’s Good That DSA Didn’t Endorse Joe Biden – The Call

Archive of critical ‘marxism’: the need for a new platform

https://redfortyeight.com/?s=marxism+critique
We have been critical of Marx and Marxism here in many posts, but this is misleading because this critique
is from the left. Any socialist (communist) who really wishes to create social transformation has to examine very carefu8lly the
legacy of the left. Because of the failure of Bolshevism the whole canon of marxism has become problematical. It is not enough
for a few converts to preach Marx cliches ad infinitum. The left needs what it had in the early Second International: an enthusiastic
and exploding base of people who wished to move beyond capitalist domination. Now those who feel that way very often wish to bypass marxism.
The purpose then of this ‘critical marxism’ is to recast the subject in search of a viable path forward.

We have been critical of Marx and marxism but we can remain with that to a large degree by displacing the legacy to an historical introduction
and recasting the subject in a form that doesn’t go down with the Marxist ship.
Turn Marx/Engels into a core heroic saga, dispense with the useless theory morass of historical materialism, explore a broader view of history,
disown d the past and cease the useless apologetics.
The left needs to drop the term ‘marxism’ and provide a fresh platform. Ironically, his theories apart much of what Marx said is still useful, e.g.
his observations about class and politics. But the moment you start preaching marxist theory you alienate everyone and confront over a century of critiques
of marxism which you can’t dismiss as class ideology.
Most of all the left needs a program for a practical future, one that is socialist, democratic, economically sane, with economic and legal rights, and
a view of society that is freed of the now-dated theories of Marx.
The many posts here are therefore from the left or even left of the left. The current left is ‘conservative’ in its own sense: it wants to conserve the sacred doctrine of Marx and then just wait for the next epoch of production to materialize. It won’t work that way.

The left has a few chances left but they must spring from a new vision. The many posts on this cited have a lot of useful leads…

The world’s near-richest man, Warren Buffet, has netted tens of billions from over 50 years of betting on stock-market rises, but unlike Trump Warren Buffet can speak the truth: “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.”American Freedom = Enriching the RichIn the first campaign of “making America Great Again”, the 40-year-old slogan Trump has brought back from the dead, Reagan defined US freedom as “the freedom to get rich”.What is not said is that this freedom “from government on our backs” has transferred $50 trillion from the bottom 90%of the population to the top 1%.

Source: The Unseen Agenda Behind Trump: Destroy the Public Realm to Free the Rich - CounterPunch.org

What Happened to Glenn Greenwald?

The simplest answer may be inertia, and time—essentially, nothing—but for better or worse I have a particular fixation on this question, and there is no denying Greenwald has become, shall we say, more problematic over the last couple of years. Glenn Greenwald needs no introduction, so suffice it to say: he first came to prominence More

Source: What Happened to Glenn Greenwald? - CounterPunch.org

These are not the reasons why putting Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court is bad, though. It’s bad because Republicans are trying to consolidate enough power to eliminate democracy (they are quite open about not believing in democracy and share the Founding Fathers’ belief that the “enlightened” property-owning minority should overrule the will of the masses), and they also intend to use their power to eliminate abortion rights, destroy environmental and workplace safety protections, crush the labor movement, put endless barriers in the way of exercising the right to vote, give the police state the unchecked power to murder people, and let the government treat unauthorized immigrants as non-people undeserving of basic human rights.

Source: I Want Deeds, Not Words ❧ Current Affairs