Whether this is a good idea or not, the first step must be a debriefing of Darwinism and false evolutionary theories.
Science has no understanding of speciation which does not follow natural selection. Without understanding speciation a new species is not possible and would only result in new and fancier ‘dogs’…
Our species may soon evolve, with the help of technology, into something more than human
Source: The American Scholar: The End Is Only the Beginning – Adam Kirsch
The number of science and technology research papers published has skyrocketed over the past few decades — but the ‘disruptiveness’ of those papers has dropped, according to an analysis of how radically papers depart from the previous literature1.
Source: ‘Disruptive’ Science Has Declined — And No One Knows Why | Portside
It would consist of a comprehensive set of policy actions designed to restore American manufacturing and technology leadership and a call to respect workers who will help our country achieve that goal.
Source: America needs a New Economic Patriotism plan – The Boston Globe
Note we have changed our site logo to ‘end(s) of history’…we will keep changing it every few months, perhaps…
The term ‘end of history’ is a bit of a hack, as is our ‘ends of history’, and has never really arrived at a stable form. We scrambled the term by putting it a plural form, mostly to examine the idea in a different way: look at the Axial Age, history can multitask, as the ‘ends’ of history, so we have an additional mystery to examine. But modernity seems to close the parallel tracks returning world history to a single complex, modernity, so to speak. The Wikipedia entry isn’t too informative and the section of postmodernism is incorrect: we have not reached the end of modernity at all. Continue reading “Eonic sequence, end of eonic sequence…//End of history – Wikipedia”
1848+: The End(s) of History 