Marxist psychology is a poor standard…//Marx, Spinoza, and the Political Implications of Contemporary Psychiatry 

Marx’s Darwinism and reductionist psychology makes him a poor candidate for a psychological critique. But nonetheless, the problems with modern psychology are severe…

Simple logic tells us that those atop a societal hierarchy will provide rewards for professionals—be they clergy or psychiatrists—who promote an ideology

Source: Marx, Spinoza, and the Political Implications of Contemporary Psychiatry –

Mental Illness Is Not in Your Head – Boston Review

Looking back as a psychiatrist and historian today, I find that these hopes feel quaint. They remind me of other misplaced visions of technological futures from the twentieth century: flying cars, pills for a whole day’s nutrition. The reality of psychiatric practice is far less glamorous than the visions of its future that I grew up with. Thirty years later we still have no biological tests for psychiatric disorders, and none is in the pipeline. Instead our diagnoses are based on criteria in a book, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (often called, derisively, the “bible” of American psychiatry). It has gone through five editions in the last 70 years, and while the latest edition is almost 100 pages longer than the last, there is no evidence that it is any better than the version it replaced. None of the diagnoses is defined in terms of the brain.

Source: Mental Illness Is Not in Your Head – Boston Review

Tom Paine, Christianity, and Modern Psychiatry

Beyond Common Sense, most Americans know little about Thomas Paine (1737-1809). Few know that at the end of Paine’s life, he had become a pariah in U.S. society, and for many years after his death, he was either ignored or excoriated—the price he paid for The Age of Reason and its disparagement of religious institutions, especially Christianity. More

Source: Tom Paine, Christianity, and Modern Psychiatry