Darwinism at the end of science?…//The academic and scientific orgs enforcing darwinism are a bunch of filthy criminals

There is something malignant about Darwinism, and almost sad. This author of the essay is academically conditioned and cannot escape the false paradigm, even as cynical Darwinists and idiotic ones enforce this dogma. The effort in this essay is simply down the drain, and the many who know better will say nothing. The amount of false research and commentary is almost staggering. The confusion runs deep and one of the strangest outcomes of the Darwin world is the way it fools highly intelligent people, further reinforcing the dogma. Nerds with enlarged IQ’s are by and large totally fooled by the dogma and contribute to the intimidation.
Sometime soon the world is going to wake up and find that not just Trump, but science is filled with lies. And the promotion of social darwinist ideology and its sly justification for political/economic violence. The theory borders on the criminal.

My comment: The issue isn’t really atheism, one way or the other. It is the theory of natural selection. Beyond any theological issue, that theory is false and Darwinism collapses. Some think…

Source: Evolution and atheism: discussion at academia.edu – 1848+: The End(s) of History

The idea that evolution occurs via natural selection and survival of the fittest is laughable, if not tragic, like everything else with homo ‘sapiens’, evolutionary theory is a screw up

The imposition of the Darwin paradigm is a grim reminder of the ideological hypnosis of an ambiguous era of science.
Look at the eonic effect: almost everything of value in world history is generated in the eonic effect’s evolutionary software, while the contribution of man is mostly violent mayhem and abuse of the gifts of real ‘eonic evolution’. How did the whole of science get captured by this nonsense. It is not as if there is evidence here. We don’t have a single example in deep time of a species emerging in this way. In fact we don’t have significant evidence at all. We do have strong evidence of the FACT of evolution, but a theory of how that happened eludes us. It is pity that Marx got taken in here because his first impression was exactly right: ideology. But he must have sensed what would happen if he opposed the theory.

https://redfortyeight.com/2021/05/21/the-eonic-effect-world-history-racism-slavery-and-the-modern-transition-2/
https://redfortyeight.com/2021/05/21/the-eonic-effect-shows-at-once-the-problem-with-darwinism-2/
https://redfortyeight.com/2021/05/21/science-must-urgently-abandon-darwinism-trust-in-science-is-eroding-rapidly/

The idea that evolution occurs via natural selection and survival of the fittest is laughable, if not tragic, like everything else with homo ‘sapiens’, evolutionary theory is a screw up

The imposition of the Darwin paradigm is a grim reminder of the ideological hypnosis of an ambiguous era of science.
Look at the eonic effect: almost everything of value in world history is generated in the eonic effect’s evolutionary software, while the contribution of man is mostly violent mayhem and abuse of the gifts of real ‘eonic evolution’. How did the whole of science get captured by this nonsense. It is not as if there is evidence here. We don’t have a single example in deep time of a species emerging in this way. In fact we don’t have significant evidence at all. We do have strong evidence of the FACT of evolution, but a theory of how that happened eludes us. It is pity that Marx got taken in here because his first impression was exactly right: ideology. But he must have sensed what would happen if he opposed the theory.

https://redfortyeight.com/2021/05/21/the-eonic-effect-world-history-racism-slavery-and-the-modern-transition-2/
https://redfortyeight.com/2021/05/21/the-eonic-effect-shows-at-once-the-problem-with-darwinism-2/
https://redfortyeight.com/2021/05/21/science-must-urgently-abandon-darwinism-trust-in-science-is-eroding-rapidly/

The baffling persistence of Darwinism…//Fred Hoyle did this fifty years ago…

The persistence of selectionist Darwinism is almost incredible and the damage done is hard to repair. But biologists are constantly producing new sophistries that the non-specialist can’t evaluate.
The whole game is pointless and yet the science community is determined to safeguard their equivalent of the doctrine of the resurrection as a public propaganda. The whole thing smacks of economic ideology as Social Darwinism and that again is a check against the reputation of and trust in science.

Behe dismantles the fundamental claim of evolutionary theory that mutations and natural selection naturally drive life toward greater complexity as new information is constantly generated. In stark…

Source: Fred Hoyle did this fifty years ago…//Michael Behe’s Darwin Devolves Topples Foundational Claim of Evolutionary Theory – Darwiniana