The evolution of freedom: antinomies in evolutionary theory?

 The idea of the ‘evolution of freedom’ is easy to define in the abstract but causes ‘computer crash’ with reductionist ‘scientific’ efforts to explain it.
We would need observational evidence here, hard to come by, but the basic idea is key to the evolution of ‘animals’….

The question of evolution in our eonic model is based on world history which give us direct access to the visible (if any) process of the evolutionary. The question arises, how can history b…

Source: Evolution to history: freedom evolving – Darwiniana

Deprogramming historical brainwashing

The eonic effect needs a college course… June 19th, 2018 ·
The previous post raised the question of historical study using the eonic effect. The eonic effect should be the subject matter for a college course, but unfortunately professional historians are extremely critical of anything that smacks of ‘speculative’ history and would never allow such a course. Perhaps that can change. Continue reading “Deprogramming historical brainwashing”

 The passing of the ‘paradigm’

But the end of darwinism was signaled even as it started: Jacques Barzun in the 1940’s even as the ‘Synthesis’ was being concocted, clearly exposed the whole game, along with others. Fred Hoyle sank the scheme of darwinism on the spot in the fifties.

The appearance of atheist critics of Darwin and darwinism, such as Jerry Fodor, despite a lot of counterattacks, signaled the end of the reign of dogmatic darwinism…or did it?

Source: What Darwin Got Wrong, Jerry Fodor, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini – Darwiniana