R48G: remorphing liberal democracy one to one with DMNC shows the ‘end of history’ argument can apply to both systems…

May 9th, 2017 •

Let us reiterate our argument in the last post (quoted below): Read our depiction of DMNC and note that the system is essentially the same as a liberal market system and yet different in the way it remorphs one to one the basic elements into a neo -communism of the Commons. But the whole liberal apparatus is still there in another form.

The point should have been obvious given the lesser version of the New Deal, for example. Does Fukuyama’s argument forbid that? His neo-con confreres surely thought so and Fukuyama made the problem worse because it has led to the cancer of privatization taken to extremes.

Does Fukuyama not see that the Commons in our formulation already exists in free market capitalism, albeit in an incomplete form. At what point does movin g capital to the Commons violate one and the same ‘end of history’ argument?

https://www.dropbox.com/home/Public?preview=Democratic_Market_Neo_Communism _ver_5.pdf

Kant and the origin of the ‘end of history’ meme

https://redfortyeight.com/?s=end+of+history

After all the confusion over the term ‘end of history’ it is interesting that Fukuyama has in fact altered his view. The term is too confused for use at this point but at least we should note that the idea of democracy is a better candidate for the usage and that in the context of a challenge to its flaws in practice: Marx was insightful on this and rightly analyzed the way ‘democracy’ was hijacked by capitalism. Obvious stuff, so why is everyone confused?

The idea of the ‘end of history’ works very well if we see it in terms of a oscillating correction along the lines of a socialist blend with democracy. Obvious stuff, so why is everyone confused. The whole idea has  been scrambled by the legacy of bolshevism and the capitalist cooptation of the idea. The insights of Marx produced revulsion with liberalism, and finally democracy, in Lenin et al. and the whole fiasco began

Instead of the term we might consider a convergence that can reconcile democracy and communism in a conclusion to the social evolution of civil society: that was incidentally clearly stated by Kant…who fortunately never used the term that has induced fumble in so many….

R48G: the eonic model and Judeo-Christianity, historical materialism, end of history discourse, and communism/democracy  

R48G: the eonic model and Judeo-Christianity, historical materialism, end of history discourse, and communism/democracy June 29th, 2017 • Source: R48G: the eonic model and Judeo-Christianity, histo…

Source: R48G: the eonic model and Judeo-Christianity, historical materialism, end of history discourse, and communism/democracy  – Darwiniana

R48G: the eonic model and Judeo-Christianity, historical materialism, end of history discourse, and communism/democracy  

R48G: the eonic model and Judeo-Christianity, historical materialism, end of history discourse, and communism/democracy June 29th, 2017 • Source: R48G: the eonic model and Judeo-Christianity, histo…

Source: R48G: the eonic model and Judeo-Christianity, historical materialism, end of history discourse, and communism/democracy  – Darwiniana

Marx’s ‘stages of production’ theory was a myth of ‘evolution’: the ‘end of history’ requires free agents… 

We noted that the issue of transitional socialism, instead of the cockeyed idiocy of bolshevism, should be easy and relaxed…The left, dominated by marxism, has made the whole q…

Source: Marx’s ‘stages of production’ theory was a myth of ‘evolution’: the ‘end of history’ requires free agents… – Darwiniana