The left allows itself to be fooled by the darwin propaganda system

It is puzzling to see how propaganda so easily ensnared the left on the subject of ‘evolution’. Debriefing natural selection is actually so easy that the result has been the demolition of darwinism by amateurs, while the darwin establishment continues in ignorance, or knowing deception…

That natural selection not only can’t produce ‘evolution’ but can actually ‘undo’ it by degrading complexity (if that is what Behe is saying in his new book) should be…

Source: How is it biologists let the religious right eat their lunch?? – Darwiniana

The left needs to fill the void on the critique of darwinism

The religious right has taken over the older critique of darwinism but turned it into a subtle form of apologetics, although the ID camp as such has tried to observe a scientific neutrality.
This critique of darwinism, which was originally a scientific one (cf. figures such as Fred Hoyle), focused on the issue of natural selection has become football for the religious right.
In the process, notably here, the whole range of issues is scrambled with right wind climate denial, a stance that throws the whole scientific pretense of these groups in doubt.
Time for the left to take over the critique of darwinism, exposing its social darwinist ideology, and freeing it from any nonsense of about other conservative issues, e.g. climate change which has nothing whatsoever to do with the evolution issue.
Noone has as yet produced a true theory of evolution, so an empirical study set with critiques would do the left nicely…

Source: The Manhattan Contrarian on David Gelernter abandoning Darwinism | Uncommon Descent

 Tide is turning against darwinism…

The tide is turning against the darwin paradigm, finally and the left dare not get stuck in the rip tide of last ditch efforts of the darwin propaganda machine…
The need to reconstuct a postmarxist critique of ideological darwinism can be an assist in the movement to a new refoundation…

It’s as if she thinks we can be free to think again, to examine the evidence. We must hope the Darwin mob loses its way when setting out to attack her. Maybe help them to lose it?

Source: Eh? Senior Canadian journalist knows Darwinism is bunk? | Uncommon Descent

‘Evolution’ and the assembly of complex objects

‘Evolution’ and the assembly of complex objects

March 24th, 2015

I think that it is not so much a question of revising ‘evolution’ theory as finding one that works for the first time. Here the model of ‘evolution’ in WHEE can help, because the term ‘evolution’ goes into free fall in a situation that has no genetic connection. We use the term all the time for any kind of developmental situation. So it is not a big deal to ‘revise’ the usage. The word hardly has a usage, while the Darwinian version is simply up in the air.
Continue reading “‘Evolution’ and the assembly of complex objects”

 Biologists in a muddle, critique taken over by amateurs…and the religious right…

Darwinists, and the left, have turned themselves into sitting ducks on the subject of darwinism. The (religious) right, even as they double-time with social darwinist ideology, has taken over the critique of darwinism (from secular biologists mostly exiled or suppressed) and had a field day on the subject. The critique of darwinism has had to be handled by outsiders (such as here) who don’t have much trouble pointing to the basic flaws of darwinism, viz. the natural selection idiocy…

Behe dismantles the fundamental claim of evolutionary theory that mutations and natural selection naturally drive life toward greater complexity as new information is constantly generated

. In stark…

Source: Michael Behe’s Darwin Devolves Topples Foundational Claim of Evolutionary Theory | Evolution News – Darwiniana

 Marx the ecologist? How about Marx the postdarwinist?

Although it is important to try and reexamine Marx in terms of ecological issues it is misleading and counterproductive in the end to try and second guess him or to attempt to make ecology fit his work in the vein of Marx is always right and the codification of marxism as a theological system. The reverse is needed to make a new leftist synthesis in which ecology and socialism are blended from the start.
If the marxists at Monthly Review wish to ecologize marxist boilerplate let’s see if they can do the same for darwinism, which Marx initially rejected on sight and then, in a compromise we suspect, embraced dishonestly as a party line…
Perhaps Monthly Review can expose the darwinian class genocide of the left, resurrect Marx’s expose of Darwin the ideologist and free the left of its murderous ‘class warfare’ as class extermination….

Source: On Marx and Ecosocialism