this is nonsense if civilization can’t achieve a true socialism first…//The Kardashev Scale – Type I, II, III, IV & V Civilization – Futurism 

We have reached a turning point in society. According to renowned theoretical physicist Michio Kaku, the next 100 years of science will determine whether we perish or thrive. Will we remain a Type …

Source: this is nonsense if civilization can’t achieve a true socialism first…//The Kardashev Scale – Type I, II, III, IV & V Civilization – Futurism – Darwiniana

 The strange cancel culture of Darwin fanatics backfires on the whole profession of biologists, caught in a closed mindset

The data of the eonic effect in world history gives us one of the few direct observations of ‘evolution’ that we have, albeit of civilizations. But the evolution of man in deep time most likely shows a similar or the same type of process. And the process is way beyond current science. Perhaps that is why biologists contract into a funk: natural selection, perhaps the most idiotic oversimplification of a hypercomplex reality that you could imagine.
In general evolution has to mediate the emergence of organisms which cannot self-assemble at random. The real process of evolution is tantamount to the generation of organisms, and in history of civilizations. There is no way around this and the myths of Darwinism are completely stupid.
Evolution clearly has to be a planetary level process, and therefore perhaps a branch of the cosmology of planets which seem to be the cradles of life and its evolution.
The eonic effect although complicated shows a completely natural process that can operate over ten millennia (in fact far more than that) on a particular species, doing so in discrete phases or transitions far apart in time, and able to gestate the abstractions of form into something that can then be tested in an environment. The work of Darwin is almost ridiculous here. Lamarck was much closer although his thinking is a bit closer to philosophy than science. But his idea of evolution on two levels is born out.
At this point scientists in the biological field get authoritarian and refuse to listen to outside critics. The thinking of Dawkins is a form of delusive obsession with the design argument. We have discussed that here many times: design is real in nature and is not a theological issue so Dawkins is hysterical here in an egregious manner that has created a cancel culture of critics. The problem there is that cancel culture backfires, and encloses professional culture in a bubble of denial and draconian measures against critics.
It has to collapse at some point, and the question will remain, how could scientists get into such a strange form of group ideological hysteria.
In any case the eonic effect is clear but incomplete data of the evolution of civilizations and in a way it is what we might suspect, but awesome in its scale.
Follow the argument and skip this obsession with Darwin, shared even by leftists whose distortions of natural selection by such as Stalin have been grotesque.

You mentioned in one of your blog posts that this article ( was an interesting challenge to the eonic model. What did you mean by that? Do you touch on this in the new book? You ask a good question…

Source: Email: the eonic model and war – 1848+: The End(s) of History

A Grim New Definition of Generation X 

People born in the 1960s may be the last human beings who will get to live out their full actuarial life expectancies.”Climate change now represents a near- to mid-term existential threat” to humanity, warns a recent policy paper by an Australian think tank. Civilization, scientists say, could collapse by 2050. Some people may survive. Not many.Some dismiss such purveyors of apocalyptic prognoses as hysterics. To the contrary, they’re Pollyannas. Every previous “worst-case scenario” prediction for the climate has turned out to have understated the gravity of the situation.

Source: A Grim New Definition of Generation X | Common Dreams Views

 The eonic model’s ‘elegant’ way of reconciling historical determination and free agency…

I would be wary indeed of using aesthetics in evaluating theories, the issue remains significant. Even as an incomplete ‘not yet a theory’ the eonic model shows a kind of elegance in the way nature ‘evolves’ civilizations and the path to reconciling the contradictions of freedom and and determination. And the evolutionary (in the sense of the eonic model) injection of creativity as potential in the stupendous display of art in civilizational emergence remains almost unnerving when compared with the stolid idiocy of most historical sociology…

Source: The ugliness of natural selection versus the elegance of the eonic model…? – Darwiniana

Can man come to understand and overtake the eonic effect? will homo sapiens become extinct?

Man is overconfident of his ‘will to civilization’ given the evidence of the eonic effect with respect to a hidden driver behind its evolution (the ‘eonic evolution’ of civilization). We must suspect that the free gift of eonic macro effects has, or will soon, come to an end and the dangers for man are considerable indeed, given his insane politics, unjust societies, economic obsessions, failed religions, machiavellian political disease, and general lack of real ‘self-consciousness’ resulting in robotic behaviorism.
We should also be ‘optimistic’ that man can graduate to superadvanced ‘technologies’ that can replace the eonic effect: applied operations over scales of tens of millennia, the riddle of creativity, the hidden occult factors in religion, the real nature of human psychology (will, soul, consciousness)…and much else…best of luck…No spaceflights to the stars until the homework is done: quarantine against cosmic contamination…

Source: Can man rise to the level of the ‘eonic effect’? – 1848+: The End(s) of History