Examining 9/11 and America’s “War on Terrorism” 

At 11 o’clock, on the morning of 9/11, the Bush administration had already announced that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks. That same evening at 9:30 pm, a “War Cabinet” was formed. And at 11:00 pm, at the end of that historic meeting at the White House, the “War on Terrorism” was officially launched.

Source: Examining 9/11 and America’s “War on Terrorism” – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

9/11 and the left’s confusion and silence over the real explanation

https://redfortyeight.com/?s=9%2F11

During all those years the left has been strangely confused about the real history of 9/11, denouncing critics of the conventional account as conspiracy theorists. One of the mysteries of the whole constellation of false flag operations is how the left got manipulated into silence, making the whole question an orthodoxy…Discussions of 9/11 at Counterpunch are especially suspect given the obsessive censorship of Alexander Cockburn.
We have also pointed to the influence of the strangely suspicious Chomsky with something to do with israel in the background…

Source: 9/11 and the American Orwellian Nightmare – CounterPunch.org

Who were the 9/11 perps?

Deep state? who were the 9/11 perps? //What Is the Deep State? | The Nation

February 19th, 2017 ·

This analysis is useful enough but misses the desperate point that a ‘deep state’ (more in the sense of Peter Dale Scott) is suspected but unknown to us. The current liberal and/or radical left cannot seem to get its act together over issues of the JFK assassination and/or the 9/11 conspiracy. Until we can

understand such histories the issue of the ‘deep state’ remains an unknown but to some extent palpable concept.

It is no use blathering about the ‘deep state’ if we can’t figure out who was behind the 9/11 conspiracy. Most of the so-called left is still floundering in a muddle on the question. And in the age of Trump we must be wary of getting shafted one more time by a false flag op from the ‘deep state’, a cover term ‘x’ for an unknown…

We can’t equate that with the outer action of George Bush, as far as we know, and that leaves the question of the ‘deep state’ very real indeed.

In the nonce we can see that many on Wall Street made a bunch off the 9/11 game plan, whatever it was, and we detect the twitchings of a deep state directly from that.

Source: What Is the Deep State? | The Nation

Between chomsky and the counterpunch gang on 9/11 the left’s muzzled silence is crippling its integrity

https://redfortyeight.com/?s=9%2F11

The question of 9/11 and its relation to a deep state and/or israeli complex of conspiracies has been very strangely factored out of the left via figures such as chomsky and the founders of counterpunch. It takes about an hour of study to see that the official account doesn’t add up and that the issue needs exposure from the left, not the confused and probably mendacious conformity enforced by the various celebrity pseudo-leftists like chomsky et al.

It is time to see that the left, from counterpunch to democracy, now has been turned into a laughing stock on this issue: i doubt if the cia could quite figure their good luck in the self-brainwashing that arose on the left and which exploited the prestige of various idiots like chomsky, who is under suspicion of deliberate deception at this point. It is almost impossible that an investigative journalist at the level of chomsky could not have checked out the hard reality here that the US and/or israel conspired to stage a mass murder incident to fuel the war on terror.

In fact, the issue of israel may provide the answer: a figure like chomsky may have been aware all along of the hidden zionist component and chosen to perpetrate the cover up for related reasons of his own.

A left that indulges the 9/11 cover up is not to be trusted: mass murder by the US/israel stands a warning of what the this government is capable of and of a deep state factor barely visible. The term ‘deep state’ is the object of some derision by some, but the point is clear, whatever the term which can be changed…