The question of the deep state was addressed here several times, but the blog Deep State appears to be subject to its own conclusions.
We have moved away from using the term at all, it has been semantically compromised in multiple ways, perhaps even by this namesake blog.
The point is simple enough: we don’t need the term to refer to a hidden factor in the US government, one that is directly involved in the issues of the JFK assassination and the 9/11 conspiracy. A blog that calls itself ‘Deep State’ and then promotes the lone gunman theory is subject to skepticism! I have not adequately studied this website but simply point to the existence of hidden factors in the US government, to put it mildly, including but larger than the JFK and 9/11 issues.
Source: A paradox of impeachment politics: There’s one area where Trump and the ‘Deep State’ are in lockstep – Alternet.org
First published on September 11, 2008 *** Note: Although the points are stated briefly, I give in each case the pages in my most recent book—“The New Pearl Harbor Revisited”—where the issue is documented and discussed more extensively. (1) Although the official account of 9/11 claims that Osama bin Laden ordered the attacks, the FBI […]
Source: September 11, 2001: 21 Reasons to Question the Official Story about 9/11 – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization
That the war on terror was an artificial construct and false flag op generating that war is still beyond the comprehension, or the mendacity barrier of all parties, left and right…
Source: We still can’t move past 9/11 politics.
This article on and by Paul Craig Roberts shows the way counterpunch got entangled in disortions over 9/11, even despite the clear expose of Paul Craig Roberts, who somehow evaded the ban on discussion of the topic: it is obvious that counterpunch knows better but for some reason is stuck in the now obvious confusion (Alex Cockburn goes back to 2006, for crying out loud)…
Continue reading “Counterpunch and hypocrisy on 9/11 conspiracy…”
In some ways as the memory of 9/11 fades somewhat a spreading realization of the stupendous lie behind the evidence of conspiracy by the US deep state (whatever that is) and/or zionist israel is beginning to make the public more and more wary of the official account…This is true on the left, but the reign of silence is still dominant given the rigid attitude of the so-called leadership, from chomsky to counterpunch. The hypocrisy is puzzling…a new generation needs to expose the left here…
The crisis on the left of both the JFK and 9/11 issues remains unresolved and treacherous.
A new left needs to expose the truth about those questions, especially 9/11 and repair its reputation after having fumbled on the question of the US simply murdering three thousand people in false flagging…Figures like Chomsky have been party to the manufacturing of dissent here…
Source: Chomsky manufactures consent on 9/11 deep state conspiracy…?//Isreali mininukes on Twin Towers…where’s the protest? – 1848+: The End(s) of History
One of the misfortunes of government propaganda is the way it has succeeded in branding the 9/11 false flag op as conspiracy theory. The facts of the case re: 9/11 are not so hard to come by and a journalist operation such as Alternet should be able to arrive at some sense here. We have a huge discussion here with many posts:
We had a post yesterday (with a large number of hits):
The public is wising up here, while the journos even on the left are dupes of propaganda…
Conspiracy theories can seem so absurd they’re almost funny: major politicians are actually 12-foot lizard people, the U.S. government was responsible for 9/11, the fluoride in our drinking water is there not to strengthen our teeth, but to control our minds. It’s easy to dismiss such ideas as nonsense.
Source: This is what happens when conspiracy theories go mainstream – Alternet.org
It takes a hour of reading the right truther literature to see that the charge of conspiracy theory for 9/11 evidence of government complicity is off the mark…
No one can figure out the russia-gate question so it is a bit sanctimonious on Hedges’ part to deal out this kind of sermonizing. The question flunked Mueller’s legal standards (and/or …
Source: Let’s hear it, Hedges, use your great investigative journalism talents on the 9/11 conspiracy…ditto for Jacobin, Counterpunch… – Toward a New Socialism
Counterpunch ed’s surely know their take on 9/11 (which seems to go back to 2006, and Alex Cockburn) is a bunch of nonsense, as the citation of the views of Paul Craig Roberts must make clear.
Disagree all you please, but more dissent on the subject is absolutely essential…
Source: The 11th Anniversary of 9/11