Decoding World History: The Eonic Effect

Decoding World History ED 1_6dcdx

Decoding World History  (decodingworldhistory.com)is a presentation of the data for the so-called ‘eonic effect’ and the hidden process of historical ‘evolution’. It can dispel the ideological muddle of current evolutionary pseudo-science and its reductionist scientism. This book demonstrates an accelerated way to study this mysterious teleological structure and its implication of the ultra-complex system of evolutionary history, for so long confused by Darwinism and its oversimplifications. The study of world history in light of the ‘eonic effect’ unlocks the secret of the emergence of homo sapiens as he enters history as a free agent and points to the hidden structure of his emergence in a mysterious Gaian planetary control system.  As man emerges from this matrix of guided evolution he needs to confront the eerie challenge of sudden self-evolution. The fate of civilizations of the future beckons as he exits the larger system at work. The nature of evolution in deep time remains an unsolved riddle, but the data of the eonic effect gives us a hint and can help to dispel the endless confusion created by the current biological paradigm as disguised Social Darwinist propaganda.

Decoding World History: The Eonic Effect: The Eonic Evolution of Civilization

https://nemonemini.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/decoding-world-history-ed-1_6dcdx.pdf
From the Preface to Decoding World History:

World history is an undiscovered country. Contemporary understandings show great confusion and make obvious the lack of a scientific perspective. Compared to the facility of physics, at least in the context of its mysterious mathematical methods that seem to develop in a just-in-time synchrony with the needs of new theories, the field of history shows no real reductionist resolution. The reason should be obvious: the issues of psychology and consciousness, values over facts, social existence, and religious versus secular discourses. History must grapple with the idea of freedom, physics must not. But all at once we confront a surprise in the reformulation of the question; the eonic effect, stumbling into an awesome mystery tour through ages in transition. One thinks of the classic phrase, voices of silence. We catch a glimpse of history’s law of motion. But that perception is of a crude outer mechanics that evolves a much more elusive complexity that has a character not seen in physics, such as ethical and aesthetic aspects, the realm of values beyond facts.
This book will attempt to demonstrate this hidden factor and approach the issue of a science of history indirectly via a new discovery we have called the eonic effect as the first real step to such a science. As we enter the unknown, we find a phenomenon of nature that still eludes us with a complexity of a new order of magnitude. We often confront machines we cannot understand, but we can see what they do. The eonic effect in history gives us a glimpse of (historical) evolution: a field of form effects operating over a species region. It is mysterious yet we can see what it is doing.

The disaster of Darwinism in a culture of science idiots

It seems like every civilization get fixated in a delusion and can’t escape from that. We speak of progress but that doesn’t include Darwinism which is a pseudo-science of now disastrous force that has turned science into a cult of random evolution. The entire biology profession id confused here. The eonic model doesn’t look like much but it can help to restructure thinking toward the ultra-complex nature of evolution, both in deep time and in history. Unfortunately the confusion is so entrenched that it looks like an endgame for modernity. Especially alarming is the obvious nature of the basic statistical confusion. Not even statisticians can seem to blow the whistle. Take a guess: your civilization is in big trouble.

Decoding World History ED1_dwh1x It is worth considering this fascinating depiction in terms of the ‘eonic effect’ so-called to see that with one exception all these advances correlate …

Source: Direct correlation with eonic sequence?!///Human Progress – – 1848+: The End(s) of History

Direct correlation with eonic sequence?!///Human Progress –

Decoding World History ED1_dwh1x

It is worth considering this fascinating depiction in terms of the ‘eonic effect’ so-called to see that with one exception all these advances correlate with the modern transition and its direct succession! The exception is Gandhi’s non-violence which is perhaps slightly out of place in the overall pattern. The challenge of non-violence should nonetheless be considered but in the larger picture where key advances provoked a need to fight for the future. Notably the Civil War is a reminder that non-violence was not able to overcome slavery. The overall question of progress is thus ambiguous to some degree. But in any case a look at the eonic sequence shows that almost all the key advances in civilization emerge in the context of the eonic effect. And that as the construct of civilization pulls away from a ‘transition’ period, the risk of things falling apart seems to increase. The period of Archaic to classical Greece like the modern case was cluster of advances, but still inside a ambiguous level of ‘civilization’ and that after two centuries beyond the ‘divide’ point 600 BCE or now 1800 AD the system effect wanes and the overall result can regress. The history of occidental civilization after 400 BCE is downhill for centuries as the era of Rome, empire and high barbarism took hold. In fact, Archaic Greece was still in a mixed state and the Greek Enlightenment so to speak was still somewhat feeble.

We should consider the eonic model because with uncanny recurrence two centuries after 1800 see democracy in trouble again, and we need to consider that the fate of ancient regression need not be ours. Suddenly a battle against democracy has arisen from the right. Right on shcedule.
It is a confusing model of history, no doubt, and not as such a science but a way to assess the meaningful dynamic of historical progression..

Mot of what we have so far is a gift. From now on we are one our own.

The question of non-violence is ambiguous: the facts are clear: the elements of modern progress are not keyed in any clear way with non-violence.

Americans are not longer trustworthy agents of progress. The classic American democracy is already corrupt, and we have to wonder if a system now so spoiled has any future cogency? Look at the record. The US has for decades done everything it can to undermine democracy in Latin America, for example. That bodes ill for the future.

Enormous human betterment has occurred since The Enlightenment, chiefly because crusading liberals overcame conservative resistance, time after time. Modern democracy arose because America’s radical founders renounced the divine right of kings and took up arms against England and George III. They created government of the people, with no aristocracy. Slavery ended because radical abolitionists hammered More

Source: Human Progress – CounterPunch.org

  Yuval Noah Harari’s Sapiens

The number of books wrecked by Darwinian assumptions is colossal and this take of world history fails on its evolutionary psychology slant.

Could someone consider Decoding World History for a realistic view of world history?

Harsh Words from Academics
Sapiens purports to explain the origin of virtually all major aspects of humanity — religion, human social groups, and civilization — in evolutionary terms. Along the way it offers the reader a hefty dose of evolutionary psychology. While reading it I consistently thought to myself, “This book is light on science and data, and heavy on fact-free story-telling — and no wonder since many of his arguments are steeped in data-free evolutionary psychology!” So I decided to look up the book’s Wikipedia page to see if other people felt the same way. Turns out they did — and the reviews from academics have been devastating.

Source: New Review Series — Yuval Noah Harari’s Sapiens | Evolution News

Capitalism is at endgame: we need a new left: in one hour’s work we have a complete new formulation…

https://www.commondreams.org/views/2021/07/20/are-we-prepared-pandoras-box-climate-catastrophes

The link to Common Dreams is the umpteenth this month warning of the coming-now-here catastrophe of our ecological disaster. We present a new framework making the point we can produce them very rapidly. It speaks to reformists and/or revolutionaries. We might prefer reformist demcratic (pseudo-socialism) but unless the left can expropriate monstrosities like Exxon, now willfully engaging in planetary ecocide the calamity will be guaranteed. We speak therefore of ‘neo-communism’ and offer a new kind of system with failsafe guarantees against stalinism,  models for a robust new kind of economy, and an exit vehicle from the stale and dated marxism. That said,  protestant reformed marxists after some sense knocked in their heads are open candidates for a new revolutionary/reformist transition.

Marxists could do an immense service by disowning marxism, and starting over with a new framework. Failing that we consider leaving them behind, to attempt something new. The material below is an hour’s work and does just that, however incomplete. There is no excuse anymore for monopolizing socialist ideas with Karl Marx as fetish saint. We have moved on and will never use the term ‘communism’ without a prefix as in neo-communism and a with failsafe revolutionary options that can bypass jacobinism and guarantee habeas corpus,etc. The left cannot rehash bolshevism, if they do, we are all dead.
The future is at risk at the start from the army of covert agency psychopaths who have billions in resources and decades of experience at destroying leftists. The must find the resolution to the near hopeless situation left to us. But the left has time on its side: the capitalists have run out of time. Having critiqued Marxists, it is also true that they have preserved the revolutionary option. For that they have our respect, although what we say is to reformists and/or revolutionaries. We have variously advocated the be drafted/shanghaied into our R48G formation (below)
The revolution/reform dilemma is false, perhaps: Gaian nature is mad as hell and is already staging the ‘Revolution’.
Our idea is that of ‘democratic market neo-communism’ which could be the blueprint to reconstruct a new society in less than a month.

R48g: Red Fortyeight Group: The algebra of left movements: Let R48G be….Movement X, revolutionary/reformist, I am too old to found a movement but I can offer an algebra of movements that are able to deal with the crisis.
Let just note that every movement based on marxism has failed. There are simple solutions to its confusions.
Some notes for a new book on an emergency left, companion to Last and First Men
The idea of the Red Fortheight Group points to the era of the bourgeois revolution moving into a socialist future in the 1848 period, the era of Marx and Engels and the first challenges to the suddenly crystallizing capitalist order. Our idea tokens a movement variable of The Red-fortyeight Group as an algebra of movementsin a superset of liberal, socialist and communist groups, factions, parties and their futures in our own time as the prophecy of the Last Revolution takes shape at a moment of global system collapse.
The need for a critical postmarxism: at a time of crisis the older facts on the ground of Bolshevism have completely wrecked the legacy of Marxism: the latter used to be an immensely popular idea but now leaves most including the working class paranoid and wary of Stalinism. The left must start over and produce a new view of history and evolution, a blueprint for a new society, and a new type of economy that works.
Again, the left MUST start over. The material was composed in one hour or so and shows how a new left can emerge in no time
We need more materials, no doubt, viz. on ecological socialism.
The left needs to critique and move beyond Darwinism which is going to be a tool of capitalists and rogue scientists to use genocide as the crisis deepens. (Stalin was the great pioneer here, to the immense discredit of Marxists.) The idea of natural selection is used by the field of rogue scientists to justify capitalism, competition, mass murder as evolution, etc…
A simple framework for a robust take on ‘evolution’ can be provided in about five minutes. The sophistical lies and deceptions of Darwinism’s natural selection are dangerous and totally unnecessary.
Our take on ‘decoding world history’ shows how easy it is to produce a simple outline/model of world history. Historical materialism is not a sound framework and leads to the worst kind of reductionist scientism. We don’t need to reduce the world to economic categories.
A sound study of history must embrace the fact/value distinction and be a story/history of free agents, with the dialectic of free will.

A work in progess, to accompany Descent of Man Revisited, and Last and First Men:
Postcapitalist Futures

Postcapitalist Futures


Preface Continue reading “Capitalism is at endgame: we need a new left: in one hour’s work we have a complete new formulation…”

History, eonic evolution and democracy/socialism

The eonic effect is a descriptive time and motion study where Marx’s historical materialsism as ‘stages of production’ theory seems like science. But that is misleading. Marx tried to produce a ‘science’ of history based on economic epochs, a severe, possibly disastrous oversimplification.

The eonic model shows clearly that world history is too complex for a theory as science. Note that history/evolution is a janus pair, that a theory has to reconcile itself with a theory of evolution (but not be the same necessarily) and explain issues of society, politics, art, (history of) science, history as literature, religion poetry and rhetoric, etc….A short list. There is no way we can produce a total theory of all of that. And ‘evolution occurs over millions of years as ‘freedom evolving ( high level generic category)’ in the transition from animal to primate to hominids, etc.. We barely have enough evidence to even describe what a theory would have to explain. Note that art among other categories appears in nonrandom fashion with eonic timing. Therefore we have a machine that can induce ‘artistic’ periods, usually followed by a rapid fall-offs. Look at the Greek Archaic Age: we see a macro effect that can process early Hellenic epic (oral) poetry into a definite literature (directing) the so-called Homers to do so. The eonic effect is behind almost all the major innovations of world history in similar fashion and timing. We can tell all this because we see a nonrandom pattern, but our knowledge is not able to produce a scientific explanation of this set of effects which operate at least over ten thousand years or before from the Neolithic onward in a definite timed sequence that can obviously recall each of its discrete steps and focalize on given global regions on the surface of the planet we live on. This is only the beginning of a description. A theory is so far beyond us that we had best refrain. We have to study Greece, Israel, the Zoroastrians, India and its religions and China, because the eonic effect has not only a sequence but a parallel action. Note that economic issues are secondary and don’t generate the overall patterns. But let us note that both democracy and ‘utopian’ city models both appear in the Greek Archaic and that democracy shows a macro effect. It shows a system effect and then disappears slowly after the fifth century. In modern times democracy and socialism appear in a related macrosequence suggesting that the two are in a complimentary position, rather than as opposites. The point was obvious to the early socialists: democracy, ‘real democracy’ (their term), should be socialist as to equality and liberty, etc… Marx and Engels well understood the point but somehow they later got entangled in abstraction. They suffered the misfortune of trying to climb out of Hegelian quicksand. The more you try the deeper you sink, apparently. And then they reacted and fell into early ‘scientism’ or Newton imitation.
There is no science here in the usual sense: the dynamic can process facts and values, verboten in reductionist causal science.
I think Marxists have to become born-again neo-socialists and consider again the category of ‘real democracy’ as used by the early socialists. The distinction of utopian and scientific is less useful. We need explicit models, not theories. Note that physicists have a theory but in practice they deal with systems too complex such as the three body problem. So they track things with incremental approximations.

Our ‘democratic market neo-communism’ is such an effort to produce ‘real socialism’ and is balanced with related categories (socialism, democracy, markets, planning) brought into conjunction rather than as opposites…

Decoding World History ED1_dwh1x This is the most tricky kind of argument using the eonic effect but its indication is important, but only after careful study of the eonic model. The point is the d…

Source:  Modernity, the eonic effect and revolution – 1848+: The End(s) of History

History, eonic evolution and democracy/socialism

The eonic effect is a descriptive time and motion study where Marx’s historical materialsism as ‘stages of production’ theory seems like science. But that is misleading. Marx tried to produce a ‘science’ of history based on economic epochs, a severe, possibly disastrous oversimplification.

The eonic model shows clearly that world history is too complex for a theory as science. Note that history/evolution is a janus pair, that a theory has to reconcile itself with a theory of evolution (but not be the same necessarily) and explain issues of society, politics, art, (history of) science, history as literature, religion poetry and rhetoric, etc….A short list. There is no way we can produce a total theory of all of that. And ‘evolution occurs over millions of years as ‘freedom evolving ( high level generic category)’ in the transition from animal to primate to hominids, etc.. We barely have enough evidence to even describe what a theory would have to explain. Note that art among other categories appears in nonrandom fashion with eonic timing. Therefore we have a machine that can induce ‘artistic’ periods, usually followed by a rapid fall-offs. Look at the Greek Archaic Age: we see a macro effect that can process early Hellenic epic (oral) poetry into a definite literature (directing) the so-called Homers to do so. The eonic effect is behind almost all the major innovations of world history in similar fashion and timing. We can tell all this because we see a nonrandom pattern, but our knowledge is not able to produce a scientific explanation of this set of effects which operate at least over ten thousand years or before from the Neolithic onward in a definite timed sequence that can obviously recall each of its discrete steps and focalize on given global regions on the surface of the planet we live on. This is only the beginning of a description. A theory is so far beyond us that we had best refrain. We have to study Greece, Israel, the Zoroastrians, India and its religions and China, because the eonic effect has not only a sequence but a parallel action. Note that economic issues are secondary and don’t generate the overall patterns. But let us note that both democracy and ‘utopian’ city models both appear in the Greek Archaic and that democracy shows a macro effect. It shows a system effect and then disappears slowly after the fifth century. In modern times democracy and socialism appear in a related macrosequence suggesting that the two are in a complimentary position, rather than as opposites. The point was obvious to the early socialists: democracy, ‘real democracy’ (their term), should be socialist as to equality and liberty, etc… Marx and Engels well understood the point but somehow they later got entangled in abstraction. They suffered the misfortune of trying to climb out of Hegelian quicksand. The more you try the deeper you sink, apparently. And then they reacted and fell into early ‘scientism’ or Newton imitation.
There is no science here in the usual sense: the dynamic can process facts and values, verboten in reductionist causal science.
I think Marxists have to become born-again neo-socialists and consider again the category of ‘real democracy’ as used by the early socialists. The distinction of utopian and scientific is less useful. We need explicit models, not theories. Note that physicists have a theory but in practice they deal with systems too complex such as the three body problem. So they track things with incremental approximations.

Our ‘democratic market neo-communism’ is such an effort to produce ‘real socialism’ and is balanced with related categories (socialism, democracy, markets, planning) brought into conjunction rather than as opposites…

Decoding World History ED1_dwh1x This is the most tricky kind of argument using the eonic effect but its indication is important, but only after careful study of the eonic model. The point is the d…

Source:  Modernity, the eonic effect and revolution – 1848+: The End(s) of History

From world history to postcapitalism

This strange situation in the US is like an invitation to pass to revolutionary transformation. The revolutionary option is rejected by reformists, but the current system is itself revolutionary, in the midst of a revolution from the right. We should respond to a system that is subversive of its own legacy as it tries to pass into fascism with a ‘counterrevolution’/revolution from the left that can recreate democracy, failsafed as socialism. The latter has to be redefined and clarifies to the point that it has popular support.  That Trump’s base is unable to see their own advantage in a real socialism shows the paradox all along of the populist right. It takes a pretty big screw up by the left for that to happen.We disown the past and start with a new far left populist socialism with both a robust new type of economy and an emergency economy as the world system slides into chaos.

Two Manifestos version
9780984702930-LFM_text(1)

The left needs a new perspective on world history beyond defunct historical materialism:
Decoding_World_History
The tide is turning towards a new socialist perspective, But if the past is any guide the left will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and end up in the same state capitalism rut run by a one-party elite that was the inexorable fate of Marxist incomplete models. A new socialist social system requires a lot of work, historical, legal, constitutional, and economic.
We have a set of books and materials dealing with a hypothetical movement called The Red Forty-eight Group, with a manifesto and a neo-communist construct, Democratic Market Neo-communism in the context of ecological socialism. Continue reading “From world history to postcapitalism”