Update: Wallace’s early confusion is understandable in context: the issue at first wasn’t a theory so much as ‘how the blazes could evolution happen at all?’ and the evidence of the fact of evolution was the first struggle as the now obvious became clear: species arise and evolve into new ones over time, not at first obvious. The idea of natural selection is at first a placeholder as Wallace having graspe the facts of evolution posits natural selection (which is a multiple pun in English) confuses the struggle of survival. The real mechanism of evolution is way beyond science so far.
Darwin was too stupid to come up with a theory of evolution but saw the item needed in the famous rip off of Wallace. This site here is critical of Darwinism, but can’t seem to look at the cl…
There are many articles/posts on this here”
The issue requires careful study to see how Darwin did it. You can miss the near perfect crime….