This type of analysis is fallacious from the start (I haven’t read the book) because the data of the eonic effect shows that the ‘evolution’ of civilization proceeds in a completely different way from the conventional thinking that can’t challenge Darwinism, etc…
here is another…I will try to deal with these when they come out. But the material on the eonic effect which these professionally bound/brainwashed profs inside peer review cancel culture couldn’t allow themselves to read.
Civilizations emerge in relation to the eonic series in a pattern of transitions which do most of the work of creating, not civilizations, by transition zones and their diffusion fields.
World history shows a complex pattern of induced development with most of the innovations springing from the strange macro process that generates most of human culture.
Check out Decoding World History….