The laughing stock literature on 9/11 from Popular Mechanics

Response to a marxmail post.
The left is almost pathetically misinformed here. How did this happen?
The popular mechanics article is almost laughable in retrospect.
Surely 9/11 was one of the most gross crimes of American imperialism.
Its false flag op staged the propaganda for the War on Terror.

Re: [marxmail] Article at Counterpunch on 9/11
From: Nemonemini
To: ;
Date: Tue, Sep 7, 2021 6:54 am
The Popular Mechanics article on 9/11 has been a standing joke among 9/11 researchers for over a decade.
The literature here is extensive:
David Griffin: Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and the Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory – January 1, 2007
by David Ray Griffin
The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé Paperback – December 30, 2012
by David Ray Griffin

—–Original Message—–
From: Chris Slee
Sent: Tue, Sep 7, 2021 2:01 am
Subject: Re: [marxmail] Article at Counterpunch on 9/11

Popular Mechanics refutes the “controlled demolition” theory:

Politically, the effect of the spread of this theory was to distract attention away from the actual crimes of US imperialism. People spent their time debating the truth or falsehood of the “controlled demolition” theory, instead of looking at the history of US intervention in Afghanistan and around the world.

Such intervention included the US alliance with Osama bin Laden against the Soviet Union and the PDPA government. But it also included invasions and US-backed military coups in many parts of the world, such as the coup attempt in Venezuela in April 2002.

Chris Slee

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s