ditto for ID hypocrites…//Biologist Robert Waltzer on Evolutionary Theory’s Room for Humility 

Although the ID critics of Darwinism have usefully exposed the fallacies of Darwinism, the whole issue of ID is a grey zone of confusion. The pretense that Dembski has made a definable science of ID is a new myth that makes the ID-ists try to hole up a kind of standard, and that is nonsense.
The religious aspect of the ID group passes without comment, as if the ‘historical design’ arguments of the Old Testament were somehow valid in the context of ID discussions. The complaints of censorship are one-sided: the design factors of the eonic effect are suppressed and never discussed, and it is impossible to even comment at their blog.

Key terms in the evolution/ID debate are often misunderstood or misused. aKey terms in the evolution/ID debate are often misunderstood or misused. These include the word “evolution” itself.

Source: Biologist Robert Waltzer on Evolutionary Theory’s Room for Humility | Evolution News

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s