Christian and darwinian historicism are blinding society from the real clue to world history

Human society is bombarded with propaganda, ideological hypnosis, and the noise factor of religious and pseudo-scientific claims on history to the point where the public knocked senseless and maintained in a state of confusion and ignorance…

The eonic effect: detecting a hidden historical driver
plus a discussion of historical materialism below…
May 30th, 2018
The eonic effect versus the universal muddle of all historical theories… February 10th, 2018 ·
The influence of bad science, bad history, and bad education backing them up has made WHEE a book almost impossible to understand, but it is actually a very practical study of the way history follows a basic developmental logic.

Why are scientists unable to deal with this? 1. they can’t handle anything that doesn’t follow reductionist causality…2. they can’t therefore handle the place of free agency in history, which is like studying a zoo with no animals…3. they can’t follow the simple logic of discontinuity given the endless confusion created here by religious thinkers…
4.most of all they can’t grasp that there is something wrong with darwinism…

The question of historical materialism
May 30th, 2018 ·
February 6th, 2018 · eight-group/
One of the reasons to suggest the macro model of WHEE to replace historical materialism is that it

1. transcends the economic where HM emphasizes it
that allows a larger view of culture and shows a model where the economic is in principle

a subcomponent
the dynamics of civilizations and economies are different
2. it does not select a subset philosophy to explain the whole (although the idea of a model is a partial exception)
instead it embraces all known historical philosophies, and religions and knowledge forms, and not only that, their evolutions over time
3. it embraces the framework of science but stands outside by not applying naive causal explanations
4. yields a structure that shows the action of facts and values together
5. provides an example of how a large scale system evolves (development over time)
6. corrects misperceptions about random evolution
7. has a definite lineage in Lamarck’s lesser theory (not his theory of adaptation) and the
Kantian teleomechanists, the first theoretical biologists in this context
8. gives a clear rationale for the massive appearance of revolution in world history during the early modern
9. bypasses the confusing ‘end of history’ discourse
10. reconciles dynamism and free agency etc…