Kant’s challenge, hegelian mystifications?

We have patiently tried for over a decade to point the way to a resolution of the dominant ‘end of history’ propaganda that was in part the outcome of the left’s distortions: the original source of the idea is in kant and taken from that source is much clearer and not so easy to distort. In fact kant sensibly asked a question instead of trying to pontificate: hegel’s attempt to resolve the question is still premature but has its own logic…and mystique.

————————–
archive: the solution to Kant’s Challenge

april 19th, 2017 ·
The solution to Kant’s Challenge (and the Hegelian idiocy over the end of history) is sixteen years old,but the academic community refuses to even look at the solution
May 12th, 2016 ·
I am often shocked by the strange mental state of academics, and in particular Kantians, what to say of those in the cohort of the Hegelian confused, over Fukuyama. A whole generation has been turning in circles around the ‘end of history’ nonsense, a fictitious discourse, while a simple solution to the question, more specifically, to the issues of Kant’s essay, was provided by WHEE: history-and- evolution.com.
You can challenge this solution, but to do that you have to lift the ostracism of Iron Cage muffled voices
that can’t acknowledge the existence of anyone outside their propaganda field.

Face reality, the solution to Kant’s Challenge is sitting there waiting for a simple comment from the
frozen idiots in the so-called philosophy field. Secularism: definition distorted by new atheists

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s