The confusion of modernity and capitalism

The left needs a new historical paradigm (one approach is the eonic model) in a form that is simplified and used as an historical outline that avails itself of the immense amount of new data that has expanded our knowledge of world history. It is not a hindrance but in reality an advantage to see from such a study that history isn’t really driven by economic forces:

the later have a definite compelling force and their manner of coming to dominate social systems can give the misleading interpretation they drive history, which is not the case. The confusion of capitalism and modernity is another aspect of the misleading economic reasoning that has become a norm on the left.
Marx and Engels got it right the first time, prior to the failure of the 1848 revolutions: they understood that capitalism could be a destructive force behind its developmental accelerative character and considered that socialism should play a role as soon as possible. One problem was the extreme contrast of opposite modes when a more realistic approach might try to blend social economic aspects and/or to bring markets into a socialist framework.
Our model of ‘democratic market neo-communism’ does just that…

Source: The need for a generalized historical paradigm – Darwiniana

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s