A Gaian riddle? May 12th, 2018 from Darwiniana
The eonic model ironically resolves the issue of historical theories by applying a kind of sequential/parallel grid matrix
and this suggests that after so much futile effort to find a theory of history the reason for the failure lies in the implications of this grid matrix. By ‘grid matrix’ we refer to the way that discontinuity applies both sequentially and laterally producing a long range sequence and a set of synchronous effects, a sort of mini-multiverse effect (metaphor only).
In this context it is counterproductive to propose simplistic attempts at theories of history: there is a real dynamic but it is something we could never have suspected and the full empirical resolution there is still premature: we don’t have the full range of evidence needed to come to a full conclusion. That point should be obvious for the earlier evolution of man: we don’t know how it happened, period….
some older posts…
R48G: the difficulty of resolving historical theories…
June 27th, 2017 ·
World history contains a hidden surprise but it cannot easily penetrate the hold of current social/historical ideology because the factual basis for such a complex entity eludes any simple resolution.
It requires an exercise in visualization of obscure moments of that history, and that requires reading books…that makes the public vulnerable to ideological manipulation, to say the least…
R48G: detecting historical dynamics…the eonic effect as a test of the data of world history…
June 23rd, 2017 ·
We have often discussed the ‘eonic effect’ as an alternate historical framework. Actually it not a completed theory or even a definite framework: rather, it works as a ‘test of the data’. We make a series of assumptions about history but fail to see how beyond religious historicism the field of modern scientism does no better. One might consider the way that a kind of orthodoxy is enforced by the new field of Big History which completely misses the point.
The eonic effect can be taken as a series of warnings: as we try to apply various models to world history we discover the unexpected, contrast of discrete and continuous processes. This is an empirical given, whatever we make of it. We can use the ‘model’ as a warning to be wary of dogmatic theories and simply operate with chronicles and empirical histories. It is also a warning that causal systematics just won’t work on history and that we must deal with free agents who are in a kind of hybrid state in a larger mix, partly causal but probably teleological. We cannot reduce this complexity to simplistic analyses of the type of historical materialism (or neo-classical economic models). One value of the eonic model is that the condition of historical determination operating on free agents is intermittent and subject to a end phase where the ‘eonic effects’ cease and free agents are bound to try and take over their own history. That’s a huge and dangerous task, and a new left must be able to operate via all categories, not just the economic. The eonic effect is a warning that virtually all parties have gotten history wrong. We must operate on the defensive and try to operate with a non-dogmatic constructivist practice. The eonic model is probably too exotic for braindead marxist but it can at least suggest a wariness about overly complex analyses that are soon millstones around one’s neck.